Developments in Abkhazia, anti-Constitutional and
anti-Georgian processes had all contributed to the establishment of ethnic
monopolism, authoritarianism and territorial partition of Georgia. At the same time, one part of the Georgian
National Movement expressed tremendous emotion, irritation and anti-Abkhazian
sentiments. This was beneficial only for the common foe. Society tried to find a way out.
In the office of the Abkhaz Writers’ Union the leaders of
opposing organizations, representatives of the intelligentsia and enterprises
held a meeting. They decided to convoke
a Congress to discuss the social-political environment, ways to overcome the
difficulties and to consolidate democratic forces in the region.
“Round Table” demanded to give their evaluation of the
December-January coup at the Congress.
Some other issues also became subjects of dispute. Finally, compromises were found. On April 29, the opening day of the Congress,
ex-Government supporters did not show up at a pre-Congress meeting to elaborate
final version of documents. Moreover, in
front of the theater the Congress delegates had been met by a large, emotional
group of people (mostly ladies) blockading the entrance with banners
proclaiming: “No access to killers”, “Bring back the President” etc. This was not the first attempt to disrupt the
session. Since September 1991, the
offices of the Kostava and Chavchavadze Societies had been routed many times
and Georgian anti-Gamsakhurdia activists were persecuted.
Finally, the Congress got a failure. In a joint declaration, signed by
representatives of 14 organizations (Ilia Chavchavadze Society – D. Latsuzbaia;
National Democratic Party – A. Jikia; Georgian Rescue Corp – B. Kakubava;
Rustaveli Society – M. Pataraia; Greens’ Movement – T. Chilachava;
Progressive-Democratic Union of Abkhazia – A. Lominashvili;
Monarch-Conservative Party – V. Jorjikia; Merab Kostava Society – T. Sanaia;
National Independence Party – Z. Naroushvili; Christian-Democratic Union – D.
Rogava; Charity organization “Komagi (facilitator)” – A. Mikadze; Young
Economists’ Association – T. Shengelia; Writers’ Union and Demographic
Society - G. Kalandia, J. Janelide; Medical Association
– D. Gulordava), the Congress was deemed to have been a treason of interests of
the Georgian population, of democracy and for the defense of human rights. “Now it’s crystal clear who brings disorder
in Abkhazia,” stated the Declaration.
“Quite apparently the former Government of Georgia has formed an
alliance with the Abkhaz separatists”.
Georgians gathered at the Subtropical Institute on May 9,
1992, at the Congress. Representatives
of the intelligentsia, cultural institutions, workers and students had all been
analyzing the current situation. The
Congress produced a declaration expressing concern over separatist movements
and possible inter-ethnic clashes. The
Georgians demanded an abrogation of the Electoral Law and other illegitimate
acts, the disintegration of the Supreme Council and to hold an election. The meeting also called for the consolidation
of all democratic forces.
The Congress established a Council of National Unity bringing
together all political and public institutions of Abkhazia, except the “Round
Table”. The list of Council members
included recognized representatives of the Georgian population (G. Gvazava, D.
Gulordava, J. Ezugbaia, V. Vekua, R. Tordinava, V. Kadenets, B. Kakubava, T.
Kilanava, G. Kalandia, Z. Kokaia, J. Lataria, D. Latsuzbaia, A. Lominashvili,
A. Maskalenko, A. Mikadze, G. Meshveliani, N. Meskhia, T. Nadareishvili, Z.
Naroushvili, M. Pataraia, Z. Papaskiri, V. Zhordania, D. Rogava, T. Sanaia, V. Pruidze,
T. Shengelia, O. Charkviani, T. Chilachava, Sh. Tsuleiskiri, Sh. Tskhvediani,
Sh. Jorjikia, A. Jikia, K. Jachvliani, M. Jgamadze).
The Council of National Unity elected an executive board (B.
Kakubava, T. Nadareishvili, M. Pataraia, G. Meshveliani, G. Gabiskiria, S.
Jikia, and M. Skhulukhia). B. Kakubava
also was an official representative of the Military Council to Abkhazia. The Council used to have open and close
sessions discussing current political, social and economic problems as well as
the military issues. The Council
practically declared civic disobedience to the separatist Government of
Abkhazia and started establishing of equal political and governmental
structures.
The first practical result of Council’s activities was the
formation of a Sukhumi battalion. Since
May 19 the battalion had been accommodated in Sukhumi. Sukhumi and Gagra “Mkhedrioni” (cavalry)
also went under the Council subordination.
The Council recommended Tbilisi to appoint Commissar (Colonel Vakhtang
Vekua) who immediately started to establish command structures.
Any attempt at political regulation in Abkhazia became a
subject of debate. From the point of
view of some politicians, the Council encouraged political tension and speeded
up the conflict.
So far, Georgian historiography could not properly evaluate
Georgian-Abkhazian relations. One thing
we can say for sure, in 1992 Georgia did not have an organized government. Politicians mostly were busy with
redistribution of power. Political
organizations and individual politicians in Tbilisi were unable to view the
tragic prospective of developments in Abkhazia.
At the same time, there was no political will or environment for
decisive steps.
One other point should be mentioned. All of Georgia, except Abkhazia, already
lived in a different political system.
The rapid fall of the Communism system was not followed with quick
changes in the mentality of the population.
Moreover, the process had not been eradicated in the entire
former-Soviet region. This gave the illusion
to Ardzinba and his supporters of a possible Soviet restoration and thereby
pushed Georgians to radicalism and even extremism.
On July 9, 1992, the newspaper “Republic of Abkhazia”
published the Resolution of the Congress of Abkhaz Political and Public
Organizations. The signatories of the
Resolution were the organizations (“Aydgylara”, “Krunk”, People’s Party,
“Slavianski Dom” etc.), former members of the coalition “Soyuz” and the most
faithful remnants of the Soviet Empire.
They expressed a very negative attitude to the Council of National
Unity. In response to the Resolution of
the Congress, the Council announced: “Our activities are directed against the
neo-totalitarian Government of the Abkhaz ASSR that isunacceptable and harmful
for the entire population of Abkhazia. Inter-ethnic tension and the illusion of
mass movement serve to maintain the pro-Soviet system and dictatorship. We have to observe the problem as a conflict
between old-Communist and growing democratic forces, and we likewise have to
consider it an ethnic conflict.”
Opposing documents from the Abkhaz side, which on the whole
benefited the common foe, followed the resolutions and announcements of the
Georgians.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий